Sunday, August 16, 2020

Why Experience is Overrated and Performance Isn't (Lou Adler, Linked In)


by Lou Adler
January 02, 2013

Who’s the better candidate: someone who can do all of the work with half the skills and experience, or someone with all of the skills and experience? 

Specifically, would you hire Mary, a person with limited experience?

Here's her story.

I was just going through our archives and found an unedited video of a person I interviewed a few years ago as part of developing some new training course content. In 30 minutes I discovered that Mary had worked for one company for four years and accomplished quite a bit with very little experience.


In particular:
  • Mary’s first job out of college was in HR, but she quickly transferred into recruiting since there was more action. Within six months she became employee of the month (out of about 3,000) by finding a number of ways to find hard-to-fill buyer positions that more experienced recruiters couldn’t. Multiple hiring manager clients nominated and endorsed her for this award. She had no prior experience in recruiting.

  • By the end of her first year she moved into a product marketing position and led the successful launch of a new product. Her big breakthrough came by working with marketing and manufacturing and modifying a design specification that was causing production delays. She had absolutely no experience in product marketing, yet she was successful. Her ability to collaborate and lead multi-functional groups was the key here. After nine months in product marketing she asked to move into sales and took an associate sales role. Six months later she took over a territory on her own. In her first year in sales she beat quota by 10%. In her second year her quota was increased by 30% and she still beat this by 15%. She made President’s Club both years.

  • She was one of the first people to move this rapidly in sales with most associates spending 1-2 years as an associate before being assigned their own territory. In fact, most people hired into the sales associate role have had some significant prior sales experience. Mary had none, yet the senior sales rep she was supporting recommended her for the bigger role based on her ability to learn rapidly, her persistence, and being able to work closely with demanding clients. She competed with other internal and external candidates who had far more experience for this job, but won out because of her innate talent, not years of sales experience in the same industry.

  • In her second year in sales Mary won a sales innovation award by figuring out a unique way to introduce a major product line to an influential end-user who was using the number one competitor’s product line. As part of this sale she led a complex capital negotiation process with a tough-minded CFO who wanted a huge price reduction. They agreed on the initial proposed price.


Some lessons:

  • Experience and skills are overrated. A continuous track record of exceptional performance in a variety of increasing complex situations isn’t.

  • When interviewing someone for any job, get into the weeds and benchmark their performance against their peers. Look for the “Achiever Pattern” in each of their positions. This indicates they’re always in the top 25% of whatever they’re doing. Mary is clearly an Achiever.

  • The best people are those who accomplish the most with the least amount of skills and experience.


If you’re a candidate without the full complement of skills and experiences, make sure you can demonstrate you’re an Achiever and someone who can get great results regardless of the circumstances.


If you’re a hiring manager or business leader, would you like to hire people like Mary, or at least be able to consider talented people like her? If so, don’t filter them out based on their level of skills and experience. Instead, ask them to describe the biggest thing they’ve accomplished with the least amount of skills and experience. Then don’t be surprised how many talented people emerge from the shadows. Surprisingly, they were always there, you just weren’t looking for them through the correct filter.


Lou Adler is the Amazon best-selling author of Hire With Your Head (Wiley, 2007) and the award-winning Nightingale-Conant audio program, Talent Rules! His new book, The Essential Guide for Hiring and Getting Hired, will be published in January 2013.


Paul E. DuCharme blogs about "what he thinks and what he likes" from his home in Southlake, Texas.

The 100 Things I've Learned in Investing (Anand Chokkavelu, Wall Street Journal)

By Anand Chokkavelu, CFA

June 29, 2012

As you'll see in No. 47 on my list, it's very important to step back and gain perspective. In an attempt to stop making the same mistakes over and over, here's my attempt to codify the 100 lessons I've learned in my investing career so far.

1. Most of this list is dedicated to insight on beating the market, but know this: It's darn hard to beat the market. Ninety-nine percent of people are best served steadily buying and holding low-cost index funds at the core of their portfolios -- and I may be understating that 99% figure.

2. Looking for a one-stop index-fund core? For a very reasonable 0.2% in fees a year,Vanguard target date retirement funds will automatically diversify and balance the stock and bond portions of your portfolio -- just pick your retirement date. The Vanguard family of index funds is what I recommend to just about everyone who asks.

3. Being contrarian doesn't just mean doing the opposite. The "contrarian" street-crosser gets run over by a truck.

4. In any financial matter, find out what the other person's incentives are. Discount accordingly.

5. Even a gut investment call should have some numbers to back it up.

6. Mistakes made in your 20s are better than mistakes in your 50s. Mistakes involving $100 are better than mistakes involving $100,000.

7. My all-time favorite Warren Buffett quote: "We like things that you don't have to carry out to three decimal places. If you have to carry them out to three decimal places, they're not good ideas."

8. Never buy stocks on margin, no matter how "can't miss" the opportunity is. That blend ofleverage and arrogance is exactly what gets Wall Street in trouble. The difference is that we're not too big to fail.

9. Don't waste time mastering things that simply don't work (see lessons 10 through 12).

10. Example No. 1: day trading. Like playing roulette, you'll have some victories, and you may be able to fool yourself into thinking you're skillful. The house just hopes you keep playing.

11. Example No. 2: technical analysis. The only chart pattern worth noting is the jagged, but likely downward-sloping line of your savings if you follow this technique.

12. Example No. 3: leveraged ETFs. Bastardized ETFs like the Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X (NYSE: FAS  ) are another great way to lose money. Even if you guess right on direction, the mathematics of the daily reckoning mean these instruments are long-term losers.

13. Stock stories about growth potential (e.g., tech stocks) are sexier than stock stories about track record (e.g., consumer goods stocks). Only the latter are verifiable today, though.

14. Having a strong opinion (let alone acting on it) is overrated. Knowing 20 stocks cold beats being able to challenge Jim Cramer in the lightning round.

15. Albert Einstein allegedly declared compound interest "the most powerful force in the universe." High-interest credit card debt aims that force at your wallet. To getcompound interest pointed in the right direction, save (and invest) early and often!

16. A casino makes us use chips in lieu of cash, partially because we forget that the chips represent real money. Stocks may act in screwy ways and invite us to play games, but as investors we can't lose sight of the fact that stocks represent real companies. As Peter Lynch puts it using a different gambling analogy, "Although it's easy to forget sometimes, a share is not a lottery ticket ... it's part-ownership of a business."

17. When talking to other investors, have your BS detector handy. When you hear their "big fish" stories, know that their brilliant track records likely have more to do with selective memory and poor scorekeeping than skill.

18. A great Buffett reason not to fudge our taxes: "We'll never risk what we have for what we don't have and don't need."

19. Those who know what they're doing make complexity seem simple. Folks who don't (or are trying to sell you something) make simplicity complex.

20. A clear sign of the latter: jargon.

21. Asset allocation is more important than stock picking. A silly example: Say you're holding a race among five horses and five human beings. Many investors spend their time trying to rank the five human beings, when they're better off just betting on the five horses.

22. If you don't understand it, don't buy it until you do.

23. Sigh -- hard work is required to beat the market. Per Peter Lynch: "The person that turns over the most rocks wins the game. And that's always been my philosophy."

24. On the plus side, the results of hard work can be breathtaking. In his book Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell gives example after example of people we term "geniuses" who are really hyper-dedicated people who work at their craft relentlessly. Among the examples he uses are Bill Gates and the Beatles. He argues that both got to where they got because of the opportunity (and inclination) to hone their skills for 10,000 hours. That's the equivalent of five full years of work -- or 1,000 weeks of practicing 10 hours a week.

Gates had access to an ultra-high-end computer terminal because his exclusive middle school started a computer club. In high school, his access went up a notch as he gained access to the computers at the University of Washington. He talks of getting 20 to 30 hours of programming time in each weekend. On weeknights, he'd slip out of his house to take advantage of the open time-sharing slots from 3 a.m. to 6 a.m. And the Beatles were just as obsessed. By the time they broke out on the Ed Sullivan show in 1964, the Beatles had played an estimated 1,200 shows, some lasting eight hours!

25. None of the time spent checking and rechecking Yahoo! Finance portfolios counts toward those 10,000 hours. And here's the real kick in the groin: 10,000 hours is a prerequisite for mastery -- not a guarantee.

26. Common sense is as uncommon in investing as it is in real life.

27. One of my favorite lessons from the poker table: Action is overrated. The best players (and investors) are constantly weighing the opportunities, but rarely are they moved to act.

28. A similar sentiment by Vanguard founder Jack Bogle: "Time is your friend; impulse is your enemy."

29. Selling is overrated. Reason No. 1: We often sell potential multibagger winners that would more than make up for our losers. The greater the quality of the business, the greater the danger of selling too early.

30. Selling is overrated. Reason No. 2: Outside of retirement accounts, selling kicks in voluntary taxes.

31. Selling is overrated. Reason No. 3: Fees.

32. In the hands of a good storyteller, almost every stock looks like a winner. Assume you're not hearing the whole story.

33. A question to ask before buying a stock: "What's my competitive advantage on this stock? Do I really know something the market doesn't?" The more specific the advantage, the better.

34. Sweat the big stuff.

35. Most of us are too enamored with "so you're saying there's a chance" opportunities. A Hail Mary belongs on the gridiron or in the pew -- not in the brokerage account.

36. A great rule of thumb for buying a house (the biggest single investment most of us will ever make), from fellow Fool Buck Hartzell back in 2005: "If a home is selling for 150 times the monthly rent (or less), it's generally a good deal. If it's selling for more than 200 times the monthly rent of a comparable property, you're better off renting."

37. One of the toughest facts about investing is that a proper track record takes decades. Charlatans can do quite well for years and years. This is potentially dangerous for our assessment of ourselves and of others. Focusing on process, rather than results, helps.

38. Price matters. A great company can be a great big loss for you if you pay too much.

39. When applicable, use the tax system to your advantage. Retirement accounts like 401(k)s and IRAs can be huge boons.

40. It is twice as easy to sound intelligent being pessimistic about the future as it is being optimistic.

41. Greater risk theoretically yields greater reward, but a stupid investment is just a stupid investment.

42. Sir John Templeton's quote: "'This time it's different' are the four most expensive words in the investing language." The details change, but the basic storylines remain the same.

43. Investing shouldn't be improv. Take the time to write a thoughtful script.

44. A key Buffett quote to understand: "Time is the friend of the wonderful company, the enemy of the mediocre." Why is this so? Partially because "you only find out who is swimming naked when the tide goes out." I really struggle to abide by this advice. I am often the Statue of Liberty when it comes to investing in inferior companies on the cheap: "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses," etc.

45. Options promise big gains in short time periods. The problem? About three out of every four expire worthless. Contrast that with a stock, which doesn't expire.

46. Sorry, market timers: Take it from Peter Lynch, who said, "If you spend more than 13 minutes analyzing economic and market forecasts, you've wasted 10 minutes." Or fellow investing great Ralph Wanger: "If you believe you or anyone else has a system that can predict the future of the stock market, the joke is on you." Or the godfather of value investing, Benjamin Graham: "It is absurd to think that the general public can ever make money out of market forecasts."

47. Keep a journal (or spreadsheet) of your stock picks, complete with your rationale for each move. Then look back on it to see if you were right. We may think we're good dressers, but all it takes is a high-school yearbook to prove otherwise.

48. Step aside, high blood pressure: Inflation is the silent killer.

49. Diversification doesn't entail making a whole bunch of dangerous investments and hoping they cancel out. That's the financial equivalent of stabbing your leg to cure your flu.

50. 13 Steps to Investing Foolishly is excellent.

51. Index ETFs may be the most wildly misused products in the stock market. They are excellent tools for ultra-low-cost buy-and-hold diversification, but many use them to day-trade the market (and sectors thereof).

52. Somewhere around 80% of actively managed mutual funds (as opposed to broad index funds) don't beat the market.

53. The more we learn about investing, the more we want to start doing exotic things (nakedstraddle options, anyone?) and buying stock in obscure companies no one has heard of. Maybe it's boredom, maybe arrogance, or maybe the desire to impress people at parties. Or perhaps it's seeking the glory of being right when few saw it coming. I'm guilty as charged on all counts. When I'm at risk of going off the deep end, I try to remember that stock picking isn't diving. As Buffett has noted, there are no extra points (or returns) for degree of difficulty.

54. This Einstein maxim is spot-on for stock analysis: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler." Both clauses are crucial.

55. Just because a company or industry is set to change the world doesn't mean it's a great investment. Beyond looking at valuation, there tends to be a Wild West of players until a few winners emerge. In fact, market beater Ralph Wanger says, "Since the Industrial Revolution began, going downstream -- investing in businesses that will benefit from new technology rather than investing in the technology companies themselves -- has often been the smarter strategy."

56. Jumping from one flavor of the day to the next isn't continuous learning.

57. Long-tail events (a.k.a. black swans) are highly underrated. Nassim Nicholas Taleb explains it best in his book, Fooled by Randomness.

58. Every time I start getting cocky (which is often), I am unceremoniously reminded there are no sure-thing stock picks. As master investor T. Rowe Price noted: "No one can see ahead three years, let alone five or ten. Competition, new inventions -- all kinds of things -- can change the situation in twelve months."

59. I personally get way too excited when a stock hits its 52-week lows or falls 50%. Many sins are washed away in my mind when I see a bargain, but price movement by itself is not a sufficient reason to buy (or sell). Falling knives can be death -- especially when they're rusty and gross.

60. A related point: No one consistently times the bottom or top of a stock's price (let alone the market of stocks!).

61. Don't let the false modesty of investing greats fool you into false confidence.

62. My three strikes against gold. Strike one: Its value can't be estimated with basic math (since it just sits around producing nothing). Strike two: Wharton professor Jeremy Siegel showed that going back to the 1800s, the return on gold has barely kept up with inflation and is left in the dust by stocks and bonds. Strike three: Gold as a doomsday investment doesn't make much sense. If the apocalypse (financial or otherwise) actually comes, you're probably screwed regardless.

63. Discount cash on a company's balance sheet. Managements are brilliant at squandering it.

64. Done properly, value investing -- e.g., focusing on low-P/E, low-P/B, low-TEV/EBITDA stocks for ideas -- has proven to work quite well. But as successful growth-investor Bill O'Neil warns, "What seems too high and risky to the majority generally goes higher, and what seems low and cheap generally goes lower."

65. You may be too smart to be rich.

66. Know thyself. Know your weaknesses and strengths. Here's a specific example from Joel Greenblatt: "For most people, stocks should represent a portion of their investment portfoliobecause I still believe that over the long term they will provide superior returns relative to mostalternative investments. However, whether that portion of an investment portfolio devoted tostock investments should be 40% of an investor's portfolio or 80% is a very individual decision. How much are you willing (or able) to lose before you panic out? There's no sense investing such a large portion of your assets in a long-term strategy if you can't take the pain when your chosen strategy doesn't work out for a period of years."

67. For some help on getting to know yourself, study the common mistakes behavior finance experts have uncovered.

68. Folks say that "success has many fathers, while failure is an orphan." Combine that with our willingness to overvalue streaks owing to one event, and I start to wonder: Do we overvalue managers that leave a successful organization to turn around a woeful organization?

69. If you just heard of the company yesterday, don't buy its stock today.

70. The Internet and better regulations have largely eliminated data advantages. The problem now is isolating which data is actually meaningful. Better results stem from increasing the signal-to-noise ratio.

71. Even if you rely on advice from others, heed the words of bond fund legend Bill Gross: "Finding the best person or the best organization to invest your money is one of the most important financial decisions you'll ever make." As with stocks, familiarity alone isn't protection. Check out our seven-part special report on financial advisors.

72. Stuff that leads to suckerdom: greed, laziness, unearned trust, ignorance, and shortcuts. When in doubt financially, do the opposite of your favorite athlete.

73. Make sure to get the right odds. There should be a vast difference between what we pay for a has-been or never-was and what we pay for a potential superstar company. As George Soros puts it, "It's not whether you're right or wrong that's important, but how much money you make when you're right and how much you lose when you're wrong."

74. Initial valuation matters, but generally, over longer periods of time (decades, not years), stocks have returned more than bonds. The more decades you have left, the more of your portfolio should be in stocks to stave off inflation.

75. In theory, well-timed share buybacks are better than dividends. They save on taxes and allow the people who know the company best to buy up shares when the market acts crazy. In practice, I'll take dividends. (A tangential bonus fact: Dividend stocks have historically beaten non-dividend stocks).

76. Some of the most misinterpreted words in investing: Peter Lynch's "Buy what you know." It's more like "Research what you know and then consider buying."

77. Don't be an Enron baby. Overweighting your investments in the company you work for is a double-down bet we don't need to be taking. On the other hand, your company's 401(k) match is free money.

78. There are many paths to the top of the investing mountain, but some are more fraught with peril -- and there are very few trailblazers.

79. Numbers frequently lie -- especially in isolation. Say you spot a P/E ratio of eight. Sounds darn cheap! But is that industry's profitability rapidly deteriorating? Was there a one-time item that temporarily juiced the bottom line? Is an upstart competitor hungrily eyeing its lunch? Are new regulations threatening its livelihood? Is it a cyclical industry? Is it in a country that has a really poor reputation for accounting fraud or government interference? You get the idea.

80. Mergers and acquisitions are overrated. Somewhere between 50% and 85% of mergers fail to boost value. The frequency of achieving promised "synergies" should be filed somewhere between unicorns and no-hitters.

81. It's hard to be an independent thinker when the pressures to conform are daily and good investment theses can look ugly for years before paying off. Ben Graham said it this way: "Even the intelligent investor is likely to need considerable willpower to keep from following the crowd." Famed investor John Templeton talked of his defense against crowd-following: "When asked about living and working in the Bahamas during his management of the Templeton Group, Templeton replied, 'I've found my results for investment clients were far better here than when I had my office in 30 Rockefeller Plaza. When you're in Manhattan, it's much more difficult to go opposite the crowd.'" The digital equivalent today is turning off real-time news and Internet feeds and reading more thoughtful analysis.

82. The best book I've ever read on the basics of stock picking: Joel Greenblatt's The Little Book That Still Beats the Market. It's literally written so that a small child can understand it. It also does a great job of explaining why return on capital is a measure to pay attention to.

83. It's not the rewards you don't understand that'll burn you, but the risks you don't understand.

84. The guy who invented the P/E ratio (James Slater) on small caps: "Most leading brokers cannot spare the time and money to research smaller stocks. You are therefore more likely to find a bargain in this relatively under-exploited area of the stock market." Of course, because there is less interest and less Wall Street coverage, doing your own due diligence is that much more important. The same holds for other underfollowed areas of the market, like special situations.

85. If you can learn quickly from your own mistakes, you're ahead of the game. If you can learn quickly from others' mistakes, you've won the game.

86. Jim Sinegal of Costco on why you can't pay too much attention to Wall Street: "You have to recognize -- and I don't mean this in an acrimonious sense -- that the people in that business are trying to make money between now and next Thursday. We're trying to build a company that's going to be here 50 and 60 years from now."

87. If it seems too good to be true...

88. Buffett's concept of the "circle of competence" is important: "There are all kinds of businesses that I don't understand, but that doesn't cause me to stay up at night. It just means I go on to the next one, and that's what the individual investor should do." Also consider Steve Jobs' quote: "Focus is about saying no." For a great book on saying no, read Seth Godin's tiny book The Dip.

89. The stock moves I've made based solely on the advice of others -- e.g., "He's a good energy analyst and he loves this oil stock," or "This famous stock picker is buying X!" -- have generally been disasters.

90. If you can read a dissenting opinion without resorting to an ad hominem attack, you're at an advantage.

91. Downer alert: We like control, but we can't control everything. Life and luck can (and will) trump investment plans. You can do everything right and still die penniless. All we can do is give ourselves a better chance to succeed.

92. That said, if you're reading this article, there's a good chance the genetic lottery has smiled favorably upon you.

93. Here's something to think about the next time you get antsy to buy immediately into the latest must-act-now opportunity (e.g., a hot IPO). The year 1986 marked Coca-Cola's 100-year anniversary. If you had bought shares to commemorate the occasion, you'd be sitting on something like 15 to 20 times your initial investment. Time waits for no man -- but stocks will.

94. How can we get rich? Per Ohio State economics professor Jay Zagorsky: "Staying married, not getting divorced, [and] thinking about savings." To those, I would add having the proper insurance coverage.

95. There are more than 5,000 stocks on major U.S. exchanges. A great stock picker finds one great stock idea a year. Don't let the ones that got away frazzle you into buying the ones you should have ignored.

96. The Pink Sheets and over-the-counter markets are where sketchy penny stocks live. Do yourself a favor and stick to stocks on major U.S. exchanges -- preferably ones with market caps of more than $200 million. And never, ever heed penny stock spam emails.

97. When I learned to drive, I nervously focused on each upcoming parked car. My father told me to focus down the road and the parked cars would take care of themselves. Perhaps my first lesson in investing.

98. Do not buy low and sell high; rather, buy low and don't sell often.

99. For the penultimate lesson, let's turn once more to Warren Buffett, who briefly said in his 2004 shareholder letter what took me 98 bullet points to say:


  • Over the 35 years, American business has delivered terrific results. It should therefore have been easy for investors to earn juicy returns: All they had to do was piggyback Corporate America in a diversified, low-expense way. An index fund that they never touched would have done the job. Instead many investors have had experiences ranging from mediocre to disastrous.
  • There have been three primary causes: first, high costs, usually because investors traded excessively or spent far too much on investment management; second, portfolio decisions based on tips and fads rather than on thoughtful, quantified evaluation of businesses; and third, a start-and-stop approach to the market marked by untimely entries (after an advance has been long under way) and exits (after periods of stagnation or decline). Investors should remember that excitement and expenses are their enemies. And if they insist on trying to time their participation in equities, they should try to be fearful when others are greedy and greedy only when others are fearful.
100.  Despite my best efforts, I will repeatedly and thoroughly fail to heed these lessons. Let's hope you're better at No. 85 than I am.


Paul E. DuCharme blogs about "what he thinks and what he likes" from his home in Southlake, Texas.




10 Rules of Leadership (T. Boone Pickens, Wall Street Journal)

  1. Have a good work ethic
  2. Make a plan
  3. Look for big things
  4. Take advice from smart people
  5. Make your case in 3 minutes or less
  6. Don’t be afraid to make a decision
  7. Embrace change
  8. Don’t cheat
  9. Have patience
  10. Be generous


Paul E. DuCharme blogs about "what he thinks and what he likes" from his home in Southlake, Texas.

Conscious Capitalism and Whole Foods (John Mackey, Raj Sisodia, HBR)

In an exclusive excerpt from their book, Conscious Capitalism, Whole Foods co-CEO John Mackey and Raj Sisodia illustrate the recipe for workplace success: It’s one part collaboration and one part friendly competition.  

(From Harvard Business Review Press. Excerpted from Conscious Capitalism: Liberating the Heroic Spirit of Business.)


Conscious companies take great care in the initial hiring. It’s much harder today to remedy hiring mistakes than it used to be, so companies should invest a great deal of time and effort to make sure they hire people who are a good fit with the organization—those who believe in the purpose of the business and resonate with its values and culture. For example, The Container Store puts candidates through eight interviews with eight people. The company primarily looks for good judgment and sound integrity; everything else, it believes, is a commodity or can be taught.


At Whole Foods Market, everyone is hired into a particular team on a probationary basis for 30 to 90 days, at the end of which a two-thirds positive vote by the entire team is required before a new hire is granted full team member status. The logic is simple: anyone is capable of fooling a team leader for a while, but it is much more difficult to deceive the entire team. Probationary team members who have poor attitudes or bad work habits or who don’t fit the Whole Foods Market culture are not elected to their team. When this happens, they have to try to find a new team to join (again on a probationary basis) or leave the company.


Once hired, most team members at conscious businesses tend to stay. As Kip Tindell says, “One of the things about The Container Store that makes me proudest is that people join this company and never leave. Our team member turnover is less than 10 percent per year, in an industry that’s over 100 percent.” At Whole Foods Market, our voluntary turnover for full-time team members (who make up over 75 percent of our workforce) is also less than 10 percent per year. Because team members stay for a long time, conscious companies can afford to invest in training them. Few companies take this as far as The Container Store, which recently increased the amount of formal training it gives each employee from 240 to 270 hours. The retail industry average is 16 hours.


An employment practice based on fear became quite well known over the last two decades, with the financial success that Jack Welch experienced as the longtime CEO of General Electric until 2001. Rooted in its rating system for team members, GE’s policy was to fire the bottom 10 percent of its workforce every year (Enron had a similar policy). The rationale is that people are so scared of being in the bottom 10 percent that they work really hard to make sure they’re not. But even if people are working hard and think they are doing okay, they can’t be sure. People can be so afraid of being in the bottom 10 percent that they begin to see coworkers as rivals rather than as fellow teammates. They try to do what they can to make sure they’re ahead of the next person on the team. Viktor Frankl wrote with shame of the relief he and other inmates felt in the concentration camps when someone else was selected for termination: “better him than me” was the feeling. We think such a policy is very damaging to workplace morale, because it creates a climate of fear and pits people against each other. Fear can be an effective short-term motivator; in a crisis situation, it can elicit extraordinary efforts for a short time. But as an ongoing policy, it’s a disaster. Why create an arbitrary 10 percent turnover? If everyone is doing well, everyone should stay.


Conscious firms count even former team members as supporters. Some, like consulting firm McKinsey and Australian law firm Gilbert & Tobin, have formal alumni programs for former team members. At most firms, laid-off team members have very hostile attitudes toward the company. At conscious businesses, this is usually not the case. For example, many people who had to be let go when The Motley Fool was forced to shrink rejoined the firm later when it started growing again.


Promoting teamwork


It is no coincidence that many conscious businesses organize their people into teams. Working in teams creates familiarity and trust and comes naturally to people. Humans evolved over hundreds of thousands of years in small bands and tribes. It’s deeply fulfilling for people to be part of a team, where their contributions are valued and the team encourages them to be creative and make contributions. A well-designed team structure taps into otherwise dormant sources of synergy, so that the whole becomes greater than the sum of the parts. The team culture of sharing and collaboration is not only fundamentally fulfilling to basic human nature, it is also critical for creating excellence within the workplace. It’s also a lot more fun. Over time, the best teams develop a sense of identity. At Whole Foods Market, for example, teams often adopt imaginative names such as the Rocking Richardson Grocery Team or the Green Produce Monsters.


Most of our teams at Whole Foods have between six and 100 members; larger teams are subdivided into subteams. The leaders of each team are also members of the store leadership team, and store team leaders are members of the regional leadership team. This interconnected team structure continues all the way up to the executive team at the highest level of the company. Teams make their own decisions regarding hiring, the selection of many products, merchandising, and even compensation. Teams have profit responsibilities as well. Most of our incentive programs are team-based, not individual. For example, gain-sharing bonuses are awarded according to team performance.


Teams allow people to feel safe and have a sense of belonging. The creative ideas of individuals bounce around within the team and get improved upon. Especially in the United States, there is a myth of the lone genius coming up with brilliant ideas that change the world. While that occasionally happens, the more common scenario is that an individual comes up with an idea and shares it with other members of his or her team; they become excited and improve upon it. The spirit of collaboration allows the idea to evolve and mature.


It is natural for people to both collaborate and compete. At Whole Foods, we have found it very effective to have different self-managing teams compete with each other in a friendly way. For example, the produce team in one store strives to increase its productivity and sales compared with other produce teams within the same geographical region, as well as other produce teams throughout the company. It is a matter of great pride to be recognized as the best produce team or the best meat team in a region or for the entire company. This is the opposite of Jack Welch’s model, where team members compete not to be terminated. Here, they compete as part of a team to be rewarded, but no one is necessarily cut from the team.


Our experience at Whole Foods Market shows that trust, cohesion, and performance are optimized in this type of small-team organizational structure. Each person is a vital and important member of the team. The success of the team depends on the invaluable contributions of everyone on the team; no one is invisible, and no one can be a free rider because the team effectively self-polices.



Paul E. DuCharme blogs about "what he thinks and what he likes" from his home in Southlake, Texas.

Mars: An Incredible Story of Corporate Success (David Kaplan, Fortune)

By David A. Kaplan, contributor

January 17, 2013

FORTUNE -- Sshh! Don't look suspicious. Keep your head down. We're on our way to a really secret organization in suburban Virginia just outside Washington, D.C. As we drive along Dolley Madison Boulevard, don't bother looking at the razor wire, tall gates, and armed guards on the right. Everybody knows that's CIA headquarters -- there's a marked sign out front (and a gift shop inside, at least for employees). No, we're going a couple more miles and hanging a left until we reach a squat, rust-colored two-story building with meager windows, a PRIVATE PROPERTY sign, no identification, and all the character of a brick storage shed. The front door is locked. Some locals have called the place the Kremlin. In the upstairs reception area, you'll see half-a-dozen portraits of the owners and their relatives. Admire them if you like, but taking photos of the portraits is strictly prohibited.

Welcome to the astonishingly modest world headquarters of Mars, the third-largest private company in the U.S. (behind Cargill and Koch Industries). With about $33 billion in global revenue last year -- we talked it out of them -- Mars would be in the top 100 of the Fortune 500, ahead of McDonald's (MCD), Starbucks (SBUX), and General Mills (GIS). It employs 72,000 people, more than a third of them in America. (Only about 80 work in the McLean, Va., headquarters; it's so small that when the chairman of Nestlé once paid a visit, he thought he was in the wrong location.) Its diversified galaxy of brands for man and beast are iconic -- from chocolate favorites like M&M's and Snickers to Wrigley's Juicy Fruit and Lifesavers to pet-care products like Pedigree and Whiskas, as well as Uncle Ben's Converted Rice. The company says it does 200 million consumer transactions a day. But despite that reach across civilization and into customer pockets, Mars is among the most secretive, insular, and little understood multinational companies around.

It is still 100% family-owned -- now by the three elderly offspring of Forrest Mars Sr., who launched Mars onto its trajectory as a confectionery colossus after taking over the business from his father, Franklin C. Mars, who died in 1934. That family is either extraordinarily private or weirdly reclusive, depending on whom you ask, though asking them isn't an option, since the last time any family members gave an interview was during the administration of Bush 41. The three owners are all multibillionaires -- each is reportedly among the 20 or so richest Americans. Ask employees -- while officially called "associates," they sometimes refer to themselves as Martians -- about a member of the Mars family, and you're about as likely to get a revealing answer as if you'd asked about the proprietary process in which they stamp "m" on the little colored candies. The shortest time interval in the Martian universe is that between when you ask about a Mars family member and when someone on the astronomically high-strung public-relations team snaps to attention and rules the question out of order. Mars can make Willy Wonka's workplace appear downright normal.

What becomes striking is that Mars is in fact a sweet company at which to be an employee. For the first time, the company has made it onto Fortune's annual U.S. roster of the 100 Best Companies to Work For. At No. 95 on the 2013 list, Mars boasts employees who love not only the products they make but also the office culture and the company's long-standing principles. That might seem surprising on the face of it. After all, punching in every day at most Mars sites -- the president has to do it too -- can seem anachronistic, even if the time clock is now a digital screen; if you're late, you get docked 10% of your pay. While compensation is very good in comparison with that of competitors, Mars offers neither stock options nor company-driven pensions. Its work sites are utilitarian rather than comfy. There are no Foosball tables or sushi chefs. "A lot of really good companies invest in the wrong architecture," says Paul S. Michaels, the nonfamily president of Mars. "Does it add value for the consumer [for] Snickers bars to pay for marble floors and Picassos?"

And yet employees thrive. Once they get a job, they stay: Turnover in the U.S. is a low 5% or so (excluding the sales force). Some families can claim three generations of employees. The 78-year-old woman who runs the in-house candy shop at the plant in Slough, England, has loyally worked at Mars since the reign of George VI -- more than six decades. The demographics of the Mars workplace in the U.S. -- about 70% of it in manufacturing, almost entirely nonunionized -- are diverse; women constitute 38% of the managers. There are even some unusual perks, like every kid's fantasy come to life: vending machines that dispense free candy all day long. Chewing gum at meetings is encouraged (as long as it's Wrigley's).

Perhaps most significant, employees have great latitude for advancement, both within their divisions and in the larger Mars ecosystem; if you've had enough of Skittles brand management, you might find satisfaction in quality control of Cesar Canine Cuisine Sunrise Breakfast ("with smoked bacon & eggs in meaty juices"!).

The company prizes the idea of developing cross-division talent -- and fortunately, nobody confuses Starbursts with Little Champions Butcher's Stew. Consider Jim Price, who's now the site-quality and food-safety manager at the chocolate plant in Hackettstown, N.J. Almost 27 years ago he began his Mars career as a janitor in a boutique chocolate operation in Henderson, Nev. His supervisor urged him to attend community college at night; Mars paid for tuition and books. If "you ask some companies for their mission statement, they have to pull it out of a drawer," he says. "Here you just have to look around." Such a story reflects corporate decency -- and shrewdness.

The irony of the company's very privateness, employees stress, is that it turns out to be a boon. Because there's a resolute lack of interest in the public markets -- which Mars says would subject it to the vicissitudes of shareholder whim and the tyranny of earnings reports -- employees have autonomy to experiment with ideas and management has the patience to train. It doesn't work that way elsewhere. Employees won't cite competitors by name, but the big ones -- Hershey's (HSY), Nestlé (NSRGF), Mondelez (MDLZ) -- are all publicly traded. "I get the benefit of a longer learning cycle," says Osher Hoberman, U.S. director for Snickers and Twix, who works in Hackettstown, the home of Mars Chocolate North America.

Many Martians get a mentor -- even the executives, some of whom go through a "reverse internship" in which a younger employee introduces them to social media. "This is probably the only company in which I was told, 'You're not investing enough in your brand,' " says Debra Sandler, president of the chocolate division, who previously worked at two public companies, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and PepsiCo. (PEP) They also have the luxury of catering to the whims of the owners: Every Christmas season, the factory churns out a few hundred tubs of private-stock Dove Peppermint Bark ice cream. It's just for the family. (We tried some. We want more.)

And Mars continues to grow, if incrementally. Late this year it will open its first new chocolate plant in the U.S. since the mid-1970s; on what used to be cornfields, the $250 million Topeka facility will create 200 full-time jobs. Within its various offices, Mars is shockingly transparent. When Fortune isn't visiting, the company displays on big flat-screens its current financials: sales, earnings, cash flow, factory efficiency. The data disclosure is designed to motivate employees whose bonuses are based on the performance of their respective divisions. Many employees -- the company won't specify a number -- get bonuses from 10% to 100% of their salaries if their team has performed well financially; the higher your rank, the more you have to gain.

Outside the office, Mars encourages community involvement through two initiatives: Mars Volunteers and Mars Ambassadors. The first offers paid time off to clean parks, aid medical clinics, and plant gardens; in 2011, 9,600 employees volunteered 37,000 hours at 290 organizations. The second, a highly competitive program, allows a select few -- 80 in 2011 -- to spend up to six weeks working with Mars-related partners in remote areas; for example, six employees spent a week in Ghana with growers of cocoa beans.

Now in its 102nd year, Mars is taking baby steps toward corporate glasnost. In an online video apparently aimed at both potential recruits and us, a few family members actually speak. "Associates … you are valued for you," declares Victoria Mars, a great-granddaughter of founder Frank Mars and the company ombudsman. But the 61-year-old Michaels makes clear that openness goes only so far at the moment. He won't tell you who's on his board of directors or its size or even if the board has a chairman. (In fact, according to a regulatory filing for 2011 in the State of Delaware, where Mars is incorporated, there are six members, all grandchildren or great-grandchildren of Frank Mars. One is Victoria Mars.)

Until sitting down with Fortune shortly before Christmas, Michaels hadn't agreed to an interview since 2008 -- which is rather a shame, as he's altogether charming and witty. He talks proudly of his own 10-year-old daughter, who isn't supposed to bring home non-Mars goodies on Halloween; but she outsmarts him, successfully arguing she's "just doing testing." One time when he went to Canada on business, a border agent inquired about the purpose of his meeting. "Global chocolate domination," he replied. They still let him in.

Mars's decision to let us peek inside is part of a conscious, self-described "campaign to build a more visible employer brand." The company has always said its people don't talk much because it is the brands that are the stars. "I'm not from the Jack Welch school of heroic CEOs," says Michaels, who's seated at his bare open-office desk at headquarters in McLean, bounded by oversize stuffed M&M characters (yes, those you can take pictures of ). But in an age of web-driven openness, as well as increasing interest among consumers about who makes what they buy, Michaels acknowledges his company may have to modify its ways. "It's about recruiting new people and retaining talent," Michaels says. "We have to change." At least a little.

Much as religions worship their tablets, the company believes in the "Five Principles of Mars": quality, responsibility, mutuality, efficiency, freedom. The principles are emblazoned on the walls of its 400 offices and manufacturing sites in 73 countries, including such faraway lands as China, Madagascar, and Saudi Arabia. At, say, pet-care headquarters, the first thing you see on walking in is floor-to-ceiling wall art featuring carefree golden retrievers frolicking in a field -- and above them each of the Five Principles. Some conference rooms bear the name of a principle, as in: "Meet me at five in Mutuality." The principles are what unify Mars employees across products and geography. "A very important tenet of Mars is we don't want to be a holding company of different companies," says Martin Radvan, the president of Wrigley, who took over the division in 2011 after 24 years in other Mars positions. "At the end of the day, I think there's a strong feeling we're all Martians."

Every Mars employee gets a glossy 27-page booklet explaining the principles in action, signed with the names of 13 family members. The principles, righteously explains the booklet, "set us apart from others, requiring that we think and act differently towards our associates, our brands and our business." For example, according to the Mars credo, the freedom principle undergirds all that makes the company exceptional. Freedom means being financially answerable to no one. And for freedom to flourish, the family is requisite: "Many other companies began as Mars did, but as they grew larger and required new sources of funds, they sold stocks or incurred restrictive debt to fuel their business … We believe growth and prosperity can be achieved another way."

Employees can, and do, recite the Five Principles as if they were handed down from the managerial heavens. They're cult as much as culture, but "they don't tattoo 'em on us or anything like that," says Will Turnipseed, a commercial sourcing manager in the pet-care division. While the principles weren't codified until 1983, they date to the early days of Mars. The company has always viewed itself as a paragon of rectitude, initially prospering in the depths of the Depression. The products had to be perfect, no matter the cost: fresh, uniform, unblemished. Ingredients weren't fudged. How Mars got its DNA -- an innovative management philosophy combined with familial eccentricity -- is the story of an American original.

A childhood victim of polio, Frank Mars spent much time in his house in Tacoma. His mother entertained him in the kitchen, where he learned the art of candymaking. By his late twenties, he had turned making butter creams into a business, Mar-O-Bar. His ambitious son, Forrest Mars Sr., with a degree in industrial engineering from Yale, then helped expand the company nationally. Together, in 1923, the Marses came up with the nougat-laced Milky Way. It was an ingenious creation because it was both cheaper and bigger than a regular chocolate bar made by, say, Hershey's. Milky Way's cousin -- the Snickers bar, named after a favorite family horse -- followed seven years later.

By 1933, Mars was taking in $25 million annually, but father and son couldn't get along. Forrest Sr. departed for Europe, with $50,000 and the Milky Way recipe from his father. He was a natural entrepreneur. After working in the Swiss chocolate factories of Henri Nestlé and Jean Tobler, Forrest Sr. developed the Mars bar -- pretty much an even sweeter Milky Way -- and in England he pioneered the notion of food for pets. Along the way -- when he saw what soldiers were eating in the Spanish Civil War in the late 1930s -- he discovered a tiny treat of chocolate pellets encased in candy shells.

Thus was born the idea for M&M's. The "M's" were Forrest and R. Bruce Murrie -- a son of the president of competitor Hershey's, which Mars asked to supply the chocolate because of limited cocoa availability during World War II. M&M "plain chocolate candies," in four colors, began selling in 1941, becoming the most popular candy in America. After his father's death at 50, Forrest Sr. eventually returned to the U.S. and finally in the 1960s merged both parts of the business after warring for decades with heirs of his father and other investors.

As the Mars business burgeoned over the years, its culture was also taking hold. Forrest Sr. eliminated private offices and divisive trappings like the chauffeured $20,000 Duesenberg. He installed those time clocks. And he boosted salaries. At the same time, he became known as an austere, ruthless boss who believed that management consisted of "applying mathematics to economic problems."

His devotion to his brands was passion or fixation -- it depended on whether you were the one on the receiving end of a tirade over an improperly stamped M&M. He reportedly liked to humiliate one executive by writing FAILED on his memos and displaying them in the bathroom. After assuming full control of the company, on an early visit to the chocolate plant in Chicago, Forrest Sr. sank to his knees and proclaimed to his employees, "I'm a religious man. I pray for Milky Way. I pray for Snickers." His own kids didn't get allowances -- or free candy. But despite his ways, or perhaps because of them, the workforce at some level appreciated his commitment, along with the ample pay, lack of hierarchy, and opportunity for professional development. While the boss wasn't beloved, he was accessible and deeply respected.

In 1973, with annual corporate revenue at about $1 billion, Forrest Sr. turned control of the business over to his two sons, Forrest Jr. and John, who -- like their father -- were both Yalies who went overseas to learn the ropes. Like their father as well, according to press accounts, they were harsh. (Mars declined to make any family members available. Forrest Jr. is now 81; John, 77.) They even clashed with each other. "This company doesn't need McKinsey as much as it does Freud," Fortune suggested in 1995. One of the great "oops" moments in product-placement history happened on the sons' watch: In 1982, Mars passed on the chance to have E.T. lured out of the forest by the M&M's of a young boy named Elliott. Mars thought the creature too scary. The movie used Reese's Pieces instead and gave Hershey's a marketing coup. When the movie was remastered in an anniversary edition, Michaels briefly looked into whether M&M's could be substituted into E.T. No luck.

Forrest Sr. died in 1999, but not before inspiring in his hardworking sons their own peculiarities. According to various press accounts, employees were prohibited from even mentioning the father in the presence of the sons. Such was the psychodramatic legacy of being raised to inherit a chocolate kingdom from a father with impossible expectations. The sons were famously frugal: One story had it that John slept in the parking lot in his Winnebago when inspecting a plant. Among the sons' strategic contributions was to focus on global expansion, like into Russia. They also in 1979 were among the first to persuade merchants to put candy displays near cash registers, the better to generate impulse purchases.

Today Mars has 11 billion-dollar brands (see graphic). Snickers and M&M's are the most popular candies in the world, and in the U.S., Mars's chocolate business is eclipsed only by Hershey's. Almost every dollar of profit gets reinvested in the company. Each Mars division functions with vast independence -- subject to the core principles. When Chicago-based Wrigley was acquired by Mars in 2008, the storied 117-year-old chewing-gum manufacturer had to gut its interior offices to change to Mars's open-floor plan; such is the value of approachability and communication that is presumed to go along with an egalitarian workspace.

Forrest Jr. and John retired as Mars co-presidents in 1991 and 2001, respectively, setting the stage for different nonfamily members to run the company day to day. In 2004, Michaels became president -- he gets no CEO title -- after 11 years as an executive at the company and prior stints at Procter & Gamble (PG) and Johnson & Johnson. The Mars family members are intimately involved with the business. "The owners have a lot of sweat equity in the company," Michaels says. "So when they give you advice or feel strongly, they have a level of credibility." He says he hears from Mars family members "a lot," which seems to mean several times a week. Employees on the line say that when they get a call out of the blue from the family, they're more tickled than threatened.

During Michaels's tenure as president, Mars revenue has doubled (in part because of the Wrigley purchase, which was partly funded by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA)). Adweek credits him with driving Mars's "creative renaissance" in advertising, like the commercial for Snickers Peanut Butter Squared featuring man-eating sharks. He's also probably had a role in loosening things up a bit after the regime of the two Mars sons. Michaels concedes the incongruity between his company's enigmatic privateness and its immense public footprint in a consumer business. "We're not making nuclear weapons," he says. "This is a company you're not embarrassed to tell people you work for." And this is the first time he's comfortable saying so since 2008? On the topic of being interviewed, he tap dances as well as any ambivalent corporate leader can in his position. "Think of it as a journey. This is a big step for us."

In the Musconetcong River Valley of northwestern New Jersey, in the old village of Hackettstown, is Mars's second-largest candy plant, along with the executive offices for Mars Chocolate North America (the largest is in Cleveland, Tenn.). Out front of the low, 500,000-square-foot building are four enormous leggy M&M characters -- green and brown on the roof, red and yellow on the sides. Their plasticized celebrity is what passes for Mars corporate pizzazz.

It's here in Hackettstown, along Chocolate Avenue, that employees make, by our count, about 192 million M&M's in 25 colors -- every eight hours. That's about half of all M&M's made in the U.S. Although the process is mostly automated -- from the swirling and molding to dozens of sequential coatings and "m" printings -- it's still time-consuming: From cocoa and sugar to package and box, an M&M takes a day to make, with half the time spent in the special coating process that creates the hard shell that, of course, means M&M's "melt in your mouth, not in your hands." About 2% are rejected for quality. If the winds are blowing right, the students at Centenary College a mile south can smell the cocoa cooking; on a good day they can catch a whiff of peanuts roasting too. At the plant, some unnamed employees are known to eat 1½ pounds of free M&M's a day.

Built in 1958, the plant and the chocolate command center next door together employ 1,230 today. Despite the location in the wilds of New Jersey, the employees -- relentlessly earnest all -- seem to adore coming to work. Upon interrogation, they'll even share why. "My kids jumped for joy when I told them 'Mom's working for M&M's!' " recalls Jennifer Mahoney, who does supply planning. "We're working on really cool five-year plans," says Rima Sawaya, the brand manager for 3 Musketeers. "We had a temporary richer chocolate taste, and now we've gone back to the original formula!"

Twenty of the employees like it so much that they make the 114-mile daily commute from the Upper West Side of Manhattan -- part of an informal carpool. It's not exactly the free, Wi-Fi-enabled, eco-harmonious shuttle service that Google (GOOG) provides in Silicon Valley. But in return for their dedication to keeping the world safe and prosperous for chocolate, they get a precious front-row CARPOOLERS ONLY spot in the sprawling Hackettstown parking lot. With a sweetener like that, it's no wonder that Mars can surely be a great place to work.



--Research associate: Marilyn Adamo






Paul E. DuCharme blogs about "what he thinks and what he likes" from his home in Southlake, Texas.